Why
was Short-Term disability Axed? Who benefits from this?
As
we all know, nothing is more terrifying that getting injured and not only
having to worry about your health, but also your families financial
survival. But, this is
exactly what happened to us this year.
The
more I ask around about this change, the less sense this benefit cut
makes. Human Resources argued against changing it, I don’t recall any
big debates about it in council, yet, there it was come budget time.
Do
you realize that this benefit cost less than $40.00 per year per civilian
employee? In fact with the police and fire employees included this number
comes down even more. Do you
know how much it costs to replace this benefit? Easily $120.00 per year
for a young healthy employee and between $700.00 to $800.00 per year for
older employees with pre-existing conditions. That is $700.00 to $800.00 a
year….if they can use it. And this is a big if, since there is a one
year ‘waiting period’ for pre-existing conditions …and wait for
it… If they can keep it, another big if, since apparently at least one
older employee has already received a policy cancellation letter.
As
Ms. De La Garza of Human Resources pointed out to council, due to the
requirement that a person use eighty percent of their sick time and have a
30 day waiting period we had an extremely low incident of use for this
benefit. Only one hundred and eleven people used this benefit in 2002. So
the question becomes, why make all of us buy it from a private company?
How did this really profit
the city? Who profits from this except a private insurance company?
Do
you realize that just for the civilian employees at the lowest rate of
$20.00 a month, this coverage would cost us 1.6 million dollars to
replace? Over a million and a half in passed on expenses to save the city
only $281,199.00. Or worse, since many people cannot afford this coverage
with the three years of decreased wages, they are running bare with no
disability coverage.
Why?
If the money was that significant to the budget, why could they not just
offer us the continued coverage for $40.00 a year? We would be covered,
they would have the good press of keeping a needed benefit and the
$281,000.00 that was so important to the
budget would have been recovered. Heck they could have asked for it
upfront and been ahead for the year.
I
think these are questions all of us need to be asking the city as they
prepare for next years budget. I would like to see this important safety
net reinstated. I would also like to see the employees get a bit more
input into benefit changes that affect them. We have had our salary and
benefits reduced for going on four years now, and I feel that we deserve
some consideration for this sacrifice. Me? I would like several things in
exchange, but I think a big consideration is more employee input into
these constant benefit changes. I would also like less last minute
changes. But what about the rest of you?
What do you want? - M. R. Frey
Human
Resource’s report to council – See line 17 http://www.dallascityhall.com/dallas/eng/ppt/BenefitsMatrix.xls
Pension
Fund Review Committee News
Rather
than stick to its previous agree-ment with the employees, where we
increased our pension contributions in exchange for the city agreeing to
put the 1999 funding solution to a citizen vote, another Pension Review
Committee has been formed.
Pension
board members Randy Stalnaker and Carla Brewer are on the committee
representing the employees and Retiree Morris Bishop, a former chairman of
the Fund’s board of trustees, is representing the retirees. Ms. Miller
has appointed Bill Quinn of A&R Invest-ments, Rusty Rose an investor,
Brenda L. Jackson an Executive vice president of Oncor and Tim Handley to
represent the city.
The
newly appointed committee met on January 14th and 15th.
Apparently most of those two meetings were spent bringing the
city appointees up to speed on the history of the plans under funding,
benefits distributed and how the pension ties into our overall benefit
package. Including what has
been recently slashed and what we are not allowed to do since we are a
municipality.
Apparently
all went smoothly except for a few things said by Mr. Benavides and his
staff which were challenged and corrected by the retirees. (Ed. Note: Hey
Ted, you gotta watch those feisty old people. They can be a tad testy.
;D ) On January 27th they
were scheduled to look over investments.
According
to reports, so far the committee members seem to be on track and have not
exhibited any signs of having a particular agenda. They did examine the
Texas Municipal Retirement System, which has a smaller payout that our
current plan does. One of the board members, Tim Hanley noted that this
plan is geared mainly towards smaller municipalities without the resources
available to larger cities such as
Dallas
.
Job
Exportation DOES affect you
I
have heard a lot of employees’ say that job exportation to foreign
countries does not affect them because they work for a municipality, and
those jobs can’t be
exported. This is so
completely untrue.
The
unemployed people left behind will eventually find much lower paying jobs.
Less money, less spending, less tax dollars for the city. Also, this
lowers the average salary and benefits paid in the private sector, and we
know how closely the mayor watches that.
Also
these people then become ‘under-employed’ getting jobs for less money,
which makes their labor cheaper than our own. They are hired by vendors,
who then pressure the city to outsource our city jobs to ‘save tax
payers’ dollars. Which as you know, is when the hidden costs come out,
but it is too late then, the jobs are lost to us.
Consider
also, Ted Benavides even said at a news conference that the only way the
city was getting away with treating the city employees as bad as they do
right now, was that the tight labor market gave us no other options.
Therefore the city did not have to worry about us leaving for better jobs
and did not have to increase our wages.
Lastly,
just because job exportation does not directly affect you, it does affect
your family. We have several employees who’s kids are not able to find
decent jobs in this tight economy or worse…. Had decent jobs and then
got laid off, so their jobs could be shipped to
India
or
Pakistan
.
Think
about that this November.
Problems
Payroll Problems
Payroll
Amazingly
enough the city is messing up our dues deductions process.
Go
figure, what are the odds hey? We have had several run ins with the city
over this, and unfortunately we are going to have to do it again.
What
is happening is that members are being dropped off our list in error or
never added no matter how many times we submit their cards.
While this is not unusual, I mean they mess up our oaychecks on a
regular basis, however, this is getting ridiculous.
If
you are a member who is not getting your dues properly deducted call,
write or email us. We are going to ‘chat’ with payroll, so we get this
taken care of again.
The
Code Enforcement Shuffle
Scott
Newland sent a letter out to all of the papers and news services at the
beginning of the month. Since Scott retired from Code Enforcement, he is
pretty familiar with their problems. He pointed out to the media that the
problems lie deeper than a few field inspectors or one manager.
He
pointed out that no one is overjoyed to see a Code Enforcement inspector
on their doorstep. If an
inspector is at your house, it is 99% certain he or she has bad news for
the owner/occupant. Paint the
house, mow the yard, get rid of the inoperable vehicle, remove all of the
items stored in the back yard, on and on.
These employees enforce over 900 ordinances in the course of their
job description. For the most
part they are verbally abused and sometimes physically threatened, robbed,
shot, and dog bit as they do their jobs.
As bad as it may sound, it is not entirely thankless.
There are neighborhood associations that appreciate what Code
Enforcement inspectors do, and there is the self-satisfaction of seeing
the improvements take place. Code Enforcement plays a key part in the
preservation of neighborhoods, especially those with historic
designations.
He
also noted that Code Enforcement recently enacted a mandatory quota of
achieving 400 “actions” per month.
The truth of the situation is that this is a very realistic number
if it is defined properly. He
feels that this quota is responsible, in part, for the recent accusations
and promises of termination. It
is his understanding from various Code Enforcement inspectors that no one
in Code Enforcement administration has defined what an “action” is and
until recently no two managers were following the same system.
In fact just recently, every manager in Code Enforcement was issued
a letter of counseling regarding the quota and now they may be more
uniform in their actions.
In
some instances employees turned in their monthly report and were short of
the
of
the required 400 actions and were told to find more numbers.
(Managers would look bad by having an employee who did not perform
adequately) Some employees
did just that, * found * numbers and turned them in a few minutes later.
(Very bad idea) So the problem is more than a few harassed field
inspectors, it also includes the managers who pressured them to ‘fix’
it and then forwarded the incorrect work logs.
Code
Enforcement Update…
Lots
of interesting stuff going on in Code enforcement due to this incident
this week.
Assistant
Director, Cheritta Johnson has been transferred to the Sanitation Dept.
effective
Feb
4th 2004
.
The grapevine tags either Faye Williams or Ron Robinson as interim
to replace her. We will wait
and see.
Gary
Middleton has returned to Code Enforcement to manage the Walker Consent
sector.
Our
Association Representatives

Please
welcome Joe Paul Fletcher to our local. Joe will be assisting Scott
Newland in handling grievance and general office duties needed to assist
our membership.
Whereas
Scott knows the city, Joe knows the unions. He comes to us from
Steelworkers Local 6580 where he was a member for 40 years. He spent the
last 20 years as president. We
look forward to teaching Joe about the city while he keeps us on the
straight and narrow as far how unions work.
Joe
is currently working on Scott’s schedule so he can pick up tips on how
the city works, as soon as he gets up to speed ‘city wise’ Scott and
he will split shifts so that we can double our coverage.
In
addition to Scott and Joe we also have Ms. Liz Barlett who does ‘pick
up’ work for us doing the taxes and making sure we stay straight with
the state and federal government.
Ms.
Barlett lives in Rockdale
Texas
and
is the local expert on union funding records. She often holds classes for
District 12 Unions on book keeping and records retention.
Something
Interesting in the paper….
This
letter was in the Dallas Morning News Letters page last month.
How
about city workers?
In
yesterday's editorial, "Changing a City – Philanthropist believes
in building bridges," you rightly recognize Margaret McDermott for
her $8 million contribution to the city.
How
about throwing out kudos to thousands of city of
Dallas
employees,
who, due to huge increases in insurance deductibles and
premiums, are effectively contributing thousands of dollars per year per
employee to city coffers? - Thomas
Prentice, Dallas
Great
letter huh? It inspired this design…
http://www.employeeblues.com
Shirts,
mugs, clocks, mouse pads… gear for the ‘gruntled employee.
J
WHAT’S
YOUR OPINION?