City of Dallas Employees Steelworkers

City of Dallas Employees Home Page

.

North Texas Association of Public Employees

Steel Workers Local 9479

Printable PDF Format of entire March 2004 Newsletter

Texas Pension Review Board Meeting

I attended the Texas Pension Review Board meeting on March 8th in Austin . Ted Benavides, Randy Stalnacker and Carla Brewer were also there. In addition to me representing the Steelworkers, Mr. Charles Griffith was there for the Dallas Retirees Association.

As expected, the city did request and have granted a 90 day extension. Benavides assured them that he did ask council if he could represent the city and they did grant him that power, so he was as official as he could be. :) The board kinda got a chuckle out of that. They outlined what the new committee had been up to, and a few things that they might be thinking of as an answer to Dallas ' problems. He did promise that he would have progress to report in 90 days, council willing of course.  

Stalnecker then outlined what the committee has found and decided so far, overall, there was no problem with the running of the fund, it is just under funded.

Griffith and I were then slated to make public comment, but as nothing new had been suggested or proposed we merely thanked the TPRB for their efforts on our behalf and reminded them that the employees and retirees  had been very patient and were still waiting for full funding.

Other Pension Committee News – Supposedly our pension benefits are perhaps a little better than the lowest private industry average. The City’s Civilian pension plan benefits are lower than the higher end private plans. So, we are NOT making out like some think.


Things Could be Worse…

At the beginning of March, I attended the first ever Steelworkers conference devoted solely to Service Sector employees. There were many different service sectors represented, higher education, security, and of course public employees, lots and lots of public employees. To say that we face unique challenges since we use public money is of course an understatement. But I did learn many things that might assist us, and met lots of employees from different states, counties and cities.

Believe it or not, I even met a few city and county employees from Alabama who are worse off than we are. Frankly I was amazed! To be honest I wasn’t sure if I should feel good that there was someone lower on the food chain than us, or panicked because that is where we are headed.

People, people, people… let me tell you, as bad as we have it, life sucks so much worse when you do not have civil service protections. I know, they don’t seem like much to us, compared to the protections available to the private sector, but believe me, the people I met in Alabama would have thought they had died and gone to heaven if they could get them instituted in their work municipalities. Who knew?  

Well apparently a few people knew. Have you looked on the city web site lately to see the charter change proposals? No? Well don’t bother, they have been removed. Look, the way it works as the laws currently stand, many laws protecting to private sector employees do not apply to us. Until such time as the STATE laws are changed to protect us, any erosion of our civil service protections is a direct attack on civilian city employees.  - M. Frey


Dallas County Anti-Labor ?

Recently a fellow employee asked what the association can really do, since we cannot strike under current law. This seems a bit of an odd question, since other municipal associations like Police and Fire do just fine. Of course I do have to admit that one of the reasons they do so well is that they stick together with other associations across the state.

 This brings us to the problem of the moment. It seems that we have public employees right here in Dallas which are being blocked from forming an association by our very own Dallas County officials. Not good for us in the labor long run. After all, the more civilian public employees in an association of some sort, the better off we will all be some day when we need to carry a problem to Austin .

It seems that in Dallas County we have a group of employees called the Dallas County Community Supervision & Corrections Department who want to associate. Unfortunately for them, they are kinda the bastard step-children of the Dallas County system. The money for their probation department is given to Dallas County by a special statewide fund.  They are hired by hired by, paid by, overseen by, and get retirement benefits from Dallas County . Oh, and they are suppose to receive all the benefits and have the same working conditions of other Dallas County Employees.  

Which they do, except for this one activity. Where other county employees can and do join various associations and have their dues deducted, some how they are not permitted the same rights. Odd yes? It seems that they are in some kind of weird fiefdom relationship with the various judges and county officials that oversee their little slice of … shall we say ‘heaven’.

After much wrangling and fussing, they finally got fed up and filed a law suit against their department.

Lawsuit!  Eeeek. Word came down from on high that they ‘would’ have been granted this right, but they needed a quarter of their department and sadly, they don’t have the numbers. A quick scan of the real department list burst that bubble. Oh, they do? Bummer. Well I guess that leaves the department no recourse except to kick it up the chain and have someone from the State Attorney Generals Office take on the case.  

Why? What is the story here? What on earth is so important about this one department, that our county officials not only feel like squandering our money to fight it, but also drag in our state officials? Is this a major stall tactic or what? There is one small chance to solve this before is costs all concerned a ton of money. Apparently the Dallas County Commissioners can, if they choose to, over ride this departmental decision and stop this nonsense once and for all.    

Please call your County Commissioner and urge them to stop this farce right now. This is not only harmful to us as a labor movement; it will cost us money as taxpayers.  

What district you are in? Look here http://www.dallascounty.org/html/comcrt/redistrict/cc-1a/ill-4cc1a.jpg

Dist 1 - Commissioner Jim  Jackson
411 Elm St , Dallas ,  TX 75202   
Phone: (972) 247-7552, Fax: (972) 406-0615  - jjackson@dallascounty.org    
 
Dist 2 - Commissioner Mike  Cantrell
411 Elm St , Dallas ,  TX 75202   
Phone: (972) 240-1740, Fax: (972) 240-1749 - mcantrell@dallascounty.org    
 
Dist 3 - Commissioner John Wiley Price 
411 Elm St , Dallas ,  TX 75202   
Phone: (214) 653-6671, Fax: (214) 653-7057  - jprice@dallascounty.org    
 
Dist 4 - Commissioner Kenneth Mayfield 
411 Elm St , Dallas , TX 75202
Phone: (214) 339-8381,    Fax: (214) 337-9558 - kmayfield@dallascounty.org    
 

CONSUMER DRIVEN HEALTH CARE PLANS  

One of the items on this year’s budget is a proposal to change the health plans that are offered to the city employees. The proposal called for a “Consumer Driven Health Care” Plan. Not to put too fine a point on it, this is one of those terms that are thrown around, but a lot of us really don’t know what it means. Other something that upsets a bunch of the retirees, what does it really mean? Let us ask a member who follows health care trends and also writes about health care for other city groups.  

*********  

The City Manager is planning to propose another change in our health insurance for this coming year.  This is called "Consumer Driven Health Care Plans” These plans have high deductibles, premiums are not much lower, involve medical spending accounts, and usually the medication portion in tossed into the mix.  

The premise is that if employees know how much medical care costs, and if they have to pick up most of the tab, they will negotiate with physicians and hospitals for lower fees.  An employer may give a few hundred dollars into a medical savings account for the employee, but when that is gone, the employee is responsible for ALL costs until the deductible is reached.  This may be as much as $3000-5000 or more for a family.  The employee would ALSO have to put money into the medical savings account just to meet the costs.  

Pros:  This might be attractive to young health individuals who rarely use health insurance anyway.  The left over money in the savings account, which is pre-tax could be rolled over to the next year.  

Cons:  Hospitals and physicians will not usually negotiate lower fees.  These deductibles may be $1500-2000 for individuals; it depends on the employers plan.  These plans discriminate against employees with families, older employees, and retirees.  If medication is included in this plan, you have lost the ability of the insurance company to negotiate lower drug prices, and may lose the mail order drug program.  You would not be able to fill a prescription or pay for medical services until it was verified how much was in your medical savings account, unless you simply write a check.  One major illness would require you to pay a large amount of money out all at once.  This would be a real hardship for the average employee.  

The bottom line is that these plans are to shift most of the health care cost to the employee.  One major problem is that the average employee can barely work in the current insurance plan and a switch to this type of plan would be a nightmare for everyone.  Considering the numerous problems the current insurance change caused so far, the threat of another change is frightening.  Especially, if we are required to sign up for insurance without knowing the specifics of the plan as happened this year.  Opponents of these plans feel that they will lead to employees doing without medical care because they can no longer afford the medication or appropriate physician care. Carol L.

*********

Information has of course been requested on what exactly is being proposed here, but it does seem that after years of the current employees paying higher fees so that all could have affordable health care, the city is thinking of throwing the employees who are older or have families into a higher payment structure. Would this be unfair? You betcha.


Non-Members vs Reality  

I have talked to many employees at City Hall both before and after the budget this year.  I feel like I must be turning blue.  I hear all the reasons for not joining "now", including "let's wait and see what they offer next year".  Talk about history repeating itself, these same people told me this last year.

Get a clue people, the budget process is an on going venture at City Hall.  Out-sourcing is on going.  The mayor is telling the business owners of lower
Greenville that if the sales tax continues to grow then the city may be able to add additional officers with no property tax increase.  The mayor is distressed to learn that we are not more fully utilizing the "police reserve officers" (no pay officers).  And just last month I was told that Mr. Benavides has asked HR to look at charging for insurance based on pay.  

Do you really feel like you have the time to wait?  We need active members, but even if you do not want to attend the meeting, we need your numbers and your dues.  To place open letters in the papers takes money.  We have to get our case to the citizens, not just to other employees. Linda P.  

*****

In looking on the net under recent briefings the following not so good news was found on page five in the FY 2003-04 Budget proposals so far.  

– Address public safety needs

• 5% pay increase for police and fire uniform personnel for second year of three year plan

• Increase “street strength” of police department

– No reduction in base pay for civilian employees

– Minimize reduction in force  

Hummm, anyone see a cost of living increase in here anywhere?? No?

http://www.dallascityhall.com/dallas/eng/council_briefings/briefings/20040204_Budget_PrioritiesFY05.pdf


Hot Button Alert  

Member Chris K. recently spent the weekend attending a Union Action meeting, he brought us back a lot of interesting information, much of which will be published in future newsletters for the benefit of all our members.  He spoke briefly at the February meeting and hit a few of the highlights for those in attendance.  

One item of importance is the need to get out the vote for the November elections. As you all know, unlike some other states, in Texas you must be registered long before the election to be eligible to vote.   Please see the enclosed voters registration card and instructions for new registrants. Read carefully, the procedure for first time registration has changed. Also there is information concerning when and how people who have previously been bared from voting can register. If you are already register, please give this to and encourage a family member or friend to register.  

The second item was that this next election is going to be an issue driven one. It is vital that we focus on the main issue of importance to us, and not be distracted by various side or hot button issues.   Let’s face it, right now the major issues are jobs and the economy. Who has them, how to keep them, and under what conditions we labor.  

This is not to say that other issues are not important, because they are, but are they the most important thing right now? Or can they be used to distract us from other problems?  

When the economy is going good, we then have the leisure to debate and wrangle over the hot button issues, but this is not that time. In this current economy it does not matter what color or model of car you drive, it only matters that your car does not get repossessed by the bank because you or your spouse have lost your job.


What have unions accomplished?

How about many things we take for granted?  

Unions have made life better for all working Americans by helping to pass laws that; 

Ended child labor.  

Established the eight-hour day.  

Protected workers’ safety and health.  

Helped to create Social Security, unemployment insurance and the minimum wage.  

These are just the highlights of course since unions are continuing the fight to constantly improve life for all working families in America . 


March Meeting Notes

Briefing from Chris K. concerning Union Action meeting he attended at the beginning of February.  

Briefing on Feb. 28th meeting with the Retirees.  

Discussed creation of local rapid response team to get information to members or community as needed.  

Discussed ways we could increase our visibility and get our message out to the Citizens of Dallas  

Voted to make a donation to Retiree Education fund for all the info and assistance they provided last budget go round.  

Voted to put Spanish translation of basic mission and newsletter on our web site.

http://www.employeeblues.com

Shirts, mugs, clocks, mouse pads… gear for the ‘gruntled employee.  J

WHAT’S YOUR OPINION? 

 

comments@ntape.com

Welcome to the Unofficial City of Dallas Employees, this page is by a City of Dallas employee for the use and benefit of civilian City of Dallas employees. It is in no way an Official publication of the City of Dallas. 

"City of Dallas Employees"

"North Texas Association of Public Employees"