City of Dallas Employees Steelworkers Newsletter

City of Dallas Employees Home Page

North Texas Association of Public Employees

Steel Workers Local 9479

Printable PDF Format of entire April  2006 Newsletter

Printable .DOC Format of entire April  2006 Newsletter  

Sign up Cards in .PDF format 

Elections Canceled  

The elections scheduled for Tuesday, March 14th at our local office will not be required. There were no positions with more than one person nominated. Therefore the nominees, once vetted by our staff rep Roy Robinson for eligibility and wiliness to serve, will assume their duties as of our May meeting.

President – Ernesto Pena, Housing.

  Vice President – Mary Hasaan, Council Office.

  Financial Secretary – Chris King, Sanitation.

  Treasurer – Erwin Horn, Development Services.

  Recording Secretary – Jackie Catron, Water.

  Grievance Co-Chairs – Michealle Frey and Frantz Orozco, both with Streets.

  Guards – James Scantlen, Development Services and Honorio Lara, Parks.

  Many employees will already know Ernesto Pena and Mary Hasaan. Both of them have been very active in civilian employee concerns over the years and have addressed our concerns numerous times before council.

  Additionally, Ernesto has long been active with civilian associations, having been a member and officer of the TPWA before joining us. Mary and her husband, who is a retired city employee, have also been community activists, and Mary is currently a member of a city board.

  Again the voting that was to take place on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 is not required and has been canceled.


Police and Fire Pay Raises?     

Recent weeks have seen a flurry of activity by police and fire employees trying to agree upon how to sell the idea of a 10-10-10 pay raise for uniformed employees to the city council. Granted, this is just a starting point, but I would like to suggest that any pay raises or incentive returns include all employees, not just those in uniform.   

Please don’t forget that the last time uniformed employees were granted 5-5-5 pay raises in addition to their guaranteed step raises, that much of the money came from eliminating all cost of living raises and merit increases for civilian employees. Since even this was not enough, a further 15 million dollar reduction in health benefit costs was also transferred to city employees.    

Should cost of living increases be granted to uniformed, the same increase should also be given to civilian employees. It would be extremely unfair to tell one group of employees that they have to exist on under funded merit raises alone, while the other group receives COLA’s in addition to guaranteed step raises.   While no one disputes that the uniformed employees have difficult and dangerous jobs, I think that sometimes the dangers experienced on a daily basis by our civilian employees are forgotten. It takes a lot of courage to stand in the middle of the street fixing potholes while cars and trucks zip along a foot or two from where one is working. Additionally other civilian jobs contend with equal if not greater hazards. 

Remember as you go into this year’s budget session that civilian employees have not recovered from the pay raise inequities of the 5-5-5 years. It would be most unfair to make us watch history repeat itself again this year.  – M.R. Frey – Letter to Council


 HMO Not Available in 2007? 

During the Employee Health Benefit committee meeting it was revealed that HMO Blue may not be available next year. Also, there may be a problem getting any HMO provider to bid on the city’s insurance.   

Human Resource Director David Ethridge stated that H.R. will be working with United Health Care, who is our current PPO provider, to try and come up with some sort of plan to address this shortfall, but that is still in the planning stage.  

Apparently, the present provider HMO Blue is loosing a ton of money. With the present wage pinch, only employees who feel they may need additional services are choosing the plan. This makes the premiums received as income very low and the premiums expended on claims very high.  

What does this mean to the employees who use HMO Blue? Who can say for sure? However, it does suggest that if current users have any important tests or surgeries that will need done in the next year or two, they may want to think about scheduling them this year.  

While it is too early to know what will happen to HMO coverage next year, anyone with an expensive medical procedure looming over, them may start considering having it done this year. Just in case.  


Health Care, what the City contributes

Full Time Employees
Member $221.00 month, $2652.00 year
Memb+
Spouse $221.00 mn, $2652.00 yr. 
Memb+Children  $359.00 mn, $4308.00 yr. 
Memb+Family $359.00 mn, $4308.00 yr.

Part Time Employees
Member $111.00 month, $1332.00 year
Memb+Spouse $111.00 month, $1332.00 yr.
Memb+Children $180.00 month $2160.00 yr.  
Memb+Family $180.00 month $2160.00 yr.

Per Open Records Request 03-2006


Strange ways to fill positions

  Lots of departments are trying imaginative and new ways to fill vacant positions. Not necessarily good ways mind you, but admittedly different.

  The CIS department has been with out a director for several months, so some employees decided to try something different. Apparently while interviews for the CIO position were being held, some CIS employees were offered an opportunity to sign a petition supporting the current interim director.

Word is some employees balked and statements about possible ethic problems were tossed around until someone finally contacted the Human Resources department about the petition. Needless to say H.R. recommended that the petition be stopped. This must have relieved a bunch of the CIS employees, since it was pointed out if an employee doesn’t sign it and the current interim director receives that position then he may see a copy of the petition without that employee’s name on it. Equally bad would be signing the petition, having it found by a new  hire CIO and being turned over to the city manager’s office as inappropriate.  

The Street department took a different approach last year. Employees were either ‘slotted in’ or ‘offered’ the opportunity to fill vacant positions so they could show their potential until the positions were hired. Reportedly some were told point blank that there would be no t-rating of their pay for working in higher grade positions. 

Like the CIS employees, this leaves employees who want to promote in a tough spot.  Agree to work at the higher grade with no additional pay or guarantee of the position… or refuse and risk a total shut out when people are being interviewed since they will have experience in that position and you won’t.  Both sets of employees know first hand how it feels to be between a rock and a hard place. L


Changing Technologies Addressed 

During a meeting on the 31st of March, Ms. Suhm stated that she really wants to reinstate the tuition reimbursement program.  Most employees will agree the reinstatement of the tuition benefit, which was cut several years ago would be welcomed as a means to help in pursuing our city careers.   

I did bring up that not only the tuition reimbursement, but also city paid training is desperately needed.  As a senior employee working in CIS I was hired as mainframe programmer using COBOL, ALC, and JCL.  The movement away from the mainframe to a server operation means that the very skills I went to school for; the very reason I received my promotion to my current position are no longer desirable.  When positions within CIS are opened they always have skills listed that a senior mainframe program-er would not have trained for or cannot brush up on down at the local community college. This effectively blocks CIS employees from qualifying for promot-ional opportunities.  I am sure that there are other departments where senior employees are facing the same blocks. I requested Ms. Suhm assist in determine-ing a means to assist these employees.  Even if the employee is willing to pay for their own additional training, once a job is listed with the new skills requirement it is too late to go back to school. - Linda P. 


 Performance Review Audit  

Recently the notion of an independent or non-departmental appeal of performance reviews was discussed with City Manager Mary Suhm. She is adamantly opposed to this, and feels that another layer of bureaucracy is not the answer.  

Suhm stated that if an employee thinks their department is not doing the reviews correctly, they need to let her know. She said that any incorrect review or scoring of an employee should prompt a look at the review and score of their supervisor.   

It was pointed out to Suhm that many employees do not feel comfortable complaining about their supervisor or department.  Also, some employees are not given a score; not at the time of the original review, nor later after the review has been signed off on by the department. They sometimes can’t even get the score when they ask for it point blank. Since the employee doesn’t know what they are receiving as a score, that makes it difficult for them to file a grievance in a timely manner.  

While agreeing that this was a problem, she said that something would have to be done to make the departments do what they are supposed to do. One of the ideas was an audit of the 2005 reviews, paying special attention to the mid-year reviews, comments and signatures… Or lack thereof.  

While not all the details were worked out, Suhm thought that the audit would be a random sampling, with a more detailed look at those departments or areas that show problems.  This would be at least a step in the right direction, since problems found should prompt changes or closer scrutiny of the 2006 reviews.  This would highlight those departments that have not been following the rules as they pertain to the department.  

As soon as anything is heard about any details or scheduling, we will post the information.

Unintentionally Amusing

 Several weeks ago, numerous employees attended a customer service program at the Dallas Convention Center . Guest speaker Michael Hoffman wanted us to take a good look at the person next to us, “This person,” he declared, “was the face of Dallas .” Cute. Not two minutes earlier that face had been complaining about his pay and problems with supervision. 

Hoffman was an excellent speaker but numerous audience members were distracted by the giant graphic projected behind him for the first half of his talk which resembled abstract skulls. J


Snipletts!

Performance Ratings – According to City Manager Mary Suhm over 87% of the employees reviewed received a 3% or above rating. The break down was 70% received a 3%, 16% received a 5% and 1.3% received a 6%.  As soon as the first paycheck with the new ratings on them is received we will again ask for a complete listing of the percentages. Don’t forget, this information is public record and anyone who wants a copy of it can file an Open Records Request. Precise Open Record Request instructions are available on our website. Look at the menu on the left.   

Anonymous Complaining? – Once again someone has put pen to paper to complain about our newsletters and flyers. One of their claims is that we are one sided and inflammatory.  No. Really? Compared to what? Compared to the balanced view of official city publications? J  

Another peeve they had were the typos that are occasionally present in the newsletters. Oh, all right….more than occasionally. Perhaps, before publication we need to run this past our editorial oversight department. Oh, wait…. We don’t have one. Bummer that… We have people with full time jobs and full time lives producing this thing on the run. Time is always short, things happen.  Learn to live with a few typo’s. ‘kay?  

This mystery person might be interested to know that I agree with them on their complaint about the lack of aesthetics on our posters, which are often too busy. But, we don’t put them out very often and we have a lot of information to cover. So art must suffer at the hands of practicality.  

I was naturally curious to know who the mystery critic was, but alas they did not sign their name. I was tempted to publish an excerpt of their note here and on our web site, and holding a ‘Who Wrote This’ contest. Their writing style and hand-writing would have likely identified them in a matter of hours. But, why embarrass their department? – M.R. Frey J

Not Interested – Is how Mary Suhm said she felt about giving the uniformed employees a Cost of Living Adjustment.  

Interested – H.R. Director David Ethridge is interested in getting ideas about what the employees think should be offered in the new health benefit package.  Email, Snail Mail or Fax him anything you are excited about.  

Life Style Changes – H.R. is looking into covering treatment for weight manage-ment (before it results in surgery) and smoking cessation (before serious health problems arise) in the 2007 Health Care Plan. As it was pointed out to them, it makes no sense for the city to preach that employees need to improve their life style choices if they are going to purchase health plans that deny coverage for them.    

Place Holder Plan – The health benefits group in looking into developing an insurance Place Holder Plan for employees who retire and go to work somewhere else or want to be covered by their still working spouse’s plan. Ideally, the plan would have very high deductibles and a very low cost. It is intended that employees could afford to continue to carry City coverage while actually using the coverage from another employer or spouse’s employer. When the second coverage is no longer available (say the spouse also retires) then they would still be eligible for city coverage, since they had not really left the plan. This would be a big help for our younger retirees.  

Good News – Direct from Mary Suhm and especially for our mystery critic. The City Manager thinks that the city economy is improving. She states that both the property tax and sales tax figures look very promising for this year. Additionally, she is encouraged by the fact that twenty cranes are set up in various places across the city. We are, she states, not in crisis mode this year. 


End of year raffle Remember at the last meeting of the year you get one raffle chance for every meeting or work session you sign in for.  Make six meetings, get six chances. So congratulations to the members who were present at the December meeting when their names were drawn for the gift certificates from Target, Best Buy and Chili’s.


What have unions done for me?  

The American concept of the weekend has its roots in labor union attempts to accommodate Jewish workers who took Saturday instead of Sunday as their Sabbath. The first five-day workweek was instituted by a New England spinning mill for just this reason. Despite a boost from the Ford Automobile company closing their factories on Saturdays, it wasn't until 1940 that the two-day weekend officially began nationwide.


The Time to Join is Now!

Don’t forget about the 30 day waiting period on certain services for new members. We don’t want anyone to miss out on assistance should they need it. The time to join is now, so you will already be a member before any problem that you need help with occurs. 


Meetings Times

  Join us on the 2 nd Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.

 April 11, 6:00 P.M.  

NOTICE

Date &Time

will change starting in May!

Check back here or call for the May Meeting Date!!

Oakwood Towers - 3626 N. Hall Street - Suite 411, Dallas Texas 

Don’t forget Parking is free in the attached garage after 5 p.m.

The attached garage has ample casual parking for stopping off during the day to pick up paperwork and is convenient for evening meeting parking. All the attached parking at this location has a clear view of the lobby door. We have numerous maps and directions on our website. http://www.cityofdallasemployees.com/codeMap.htm  


Get the Fax! 

If you have a fax you can be the first to know what is happening. Simply fax your name and fax number to 214-760-7423 to be put on the fax info list.  Want to be notified at home when a new newsletter is published? Email your home email address to newsletter@cityofdallasemployees.com or fax it to 214-760-7423. Or you can always just check on our website.


Help your Association by helping yourself.

You can help grow your union and get paid at the same time. You can earn  $10.00 for each member you sign up!. And they get a hat and the knowledge that they taking a positive step towards creating a better workplace.

Best yet? You don’t even have to stop in the office to turn in the cards. All you have to do is put your name at the bottom of the new members card and then mail or fax it into the office. It is that simple.   

As soon as that new member appears on our membership rolls, you can pick up your check at the next meeting. 


Henderson’s Chicken is Back! – Okay, so this is not union news, but it is of importance to a lot of us who work in South East Dallas! As a lot of you know, Henderson ’s has always been very nice in letting us post notices and newsletters at their facility in the past, so we are happy to assist them in getting the word out. Their new location is 3103 Grand Ave , 214-421-1777 – Welcome Back, we missed you!

 

WHAT’S YOUR OPINION? 

 

comments@ntape.com

Welcome to the Unofficial City of Dallas Employees, this page is by a City of Dallas employee for the use and benefit of civilian City of Dallas employees. It is in no way an Official publication of the City of Dallas. 

"City of Dallas Employees"

"North Texas Association of Public Employees"