City of Dallas Employees Steelworkers Newsletter

City of Dallas Employees Home Page

North Texas Association of Public Employees

Steel Workers Local 9479

Printable PDF Format of entire June  2006 Newsletter

Printable .DOC Format of entire June  2006 Newsletter  

Sign up Cards in .PDF format 

Merit Raise Problems Persist

Once again this year the one thing really necessary to improve your chances of getting an above average Merit Score is having a grade of H or better. Surprise! Oh, okay. Not a surprise, more like an unwelcome truth. 

 Examination of the 1213 merit scores that were rated above average showed that 659 (54%) went to employees grade A thru G. However 554 (46%) went to employees H or higher. This might seem pretty even unless you also consider that the H and higher group represent only 25% of the employees. Almost a 50% increase in your chance of making a good score if you are in the higher grades.   

If you look at the chart on page two, you can see that certain groups faired far worse than other. Despite promises to various council members that things would be more equitable this time around they weren’t. Once again the employees in grade C had the highest percentage of  poor or below average grades. But at least they are spread out in all the city departments.  What the heck is happening with the library? They are the only department with Grade A employees and almost 1/3 of them received below average grades. Kinda makes ya glad you don’t work there doesn’t it. Or at least not working there in that grade.    

As bad as this persistent inequity in scoring is the lack of changes in the appeal process. The person signing off on your raise is still the person that you do your final appeal to. :P Bleh to that.   

If you are not happy with the distribution of scores, you will need to let council know about it. You can find the address/phone number or email address on the letters link. If you don’t tell them, they won’t know. It is that simple. M. R. Frey


Complete Merit Score List 

is available to all Steelworker Members. You can pick it up at our next meeting, or email us at comments@ntape.com 


 

Grade

++No Rating

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

a

0

0

21

0

48

0

4

0

73

b

5

6

102

1

520

0

61

4

699

c

6

9

138

0

925

0

93

6

1177

d

10

7

67

0

516

0

124

5

729

e

6

4

71

8

540

0

103

2

734

f

8

7

92

0

618

0

132

4

861

g

0

2

32

0

369

2

112

7

524

h

2

3

32

1

332

1

97

16

484

I

2

0

36

2

244

1

121

13

419

j

3

2

10

0

95

0

66

4

180

k

4

1

13

0

92

1

62

12

185

l

0

0

3

15

56

15

22

6

117

m

1

0

9

0

81

0

61

10

162

n

1

0

0

0

35

2

22

0

60

o

0

0

1

0

3

0

3

0

7

p

1

0

0

0

24

0

3

1

29

q

0

2

0

3

0

0

0

0

5

r

0

1

0

0

9

0

0

0

10

UnG*

0

0

0

0

1

0

10

3

14

 

49

44

627

30

4508

22

1096

93

6469

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low Grades

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

No Rating

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Total

a

0

0

21

0

48

0

4

0

73

b

5

6

102

1

520

0

61

4

699

c

6

9

138

0

925

0

93

6

1177

d

10

7

67

0

516

0

124

5

729

e

6

4

71

8

540

0

103

2

734

f

8

7

92

0

618

0

132